On 5/31/07, Thomas Renninger <[email protected]> wrote:
(This should efficiently be the same as the proposed big patch a year
ago from Pekka Enberg, just a bit smaller and should make ACPICA and
kernel/linux people happy:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=113699535303722&w=2)
No, you're keeping these obfuscating macros around:
+#define return_VOID return
+#define return_ACPI_STATUS(s) return(s)
+#define return_VALUE(s) return(s)
+#define return_UINT8(s) return(s)
Making the ACPI code look like regular Linux kernel code (or even
regular C for that matter) was the whole point of my patch. Your patch
doesn't change that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
