Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * K.R. Foley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Ingo,
>>
>> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to 
>> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3.
> 
> yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3.
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit differently
than previous versions. Sorry.

-- 
   kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
    • From: "K.R. Foley" <[email protected]>
  • Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + loop-preallocate-eight-loop-devices.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: floppy.c soft lockup
• Previous by thread: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
• Next by thread: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]