Re: [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 31 May 2007 05:56:33 -0600 [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> >> I suspect that is a pretty rare case but it does indeed seem to exist
> >> as a problem.
> >
> > I think so too. But either we have some misunderstanding of the
> > codepaths involved, or the author of the comments there didn't
> > consider this case, so...
> 
> Do someone needs to stand up and write the additional patches.
> Do we have a maintainer for fs/buffer.c?

me, if any one, I guess.  But I haven't really been following
this discussion - too long and slow ;)  'twould be good if you
could reprise it all in one email, presumably in diff -u form..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux