On Thu, 31 May 2007 13:20:48 +0200 Pierre Ossman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
(top-posting reversed)
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> Whatever. I think you can work it out ;)
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Bare with me, I just woke up ;)
> >
> >> while (driver_probe_done() || (ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(...)) == 0)
> >>
> >> perhaps?
> >>
> >> The loop-which-sleeps within a loop-which-sleeps seems poorly thought out?
> >>
> >
> > I'd say a matter of taste. I'm not a big fan och cramming things into
> > the while() clause.
> >
> > The idea with the double loops was to keep this thread asleep when we
> > could detect meaningful work elsewhere in the kernel. You could just
> > remove the inner-most loop if it offends you. :)
> >
>
> What was the verdict here? Were you satisfied with this or do you need a change?
I was kinda hoing to see version #2 with that funny loop cleaned up a bit?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
