Re: [BUG] Something goes wrong with timer statistics.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007.05.31 17:10:07 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Well... :) , there is still a memory barrier missing it seems.
> 
> Another cpu might see a bad value if 'active=1' is set before tstat_hash_table is really cleared.

Hm, that even makes the assumption in my first try valid ;-)
Just for the record, this time I thought that the barrier from the
spinlock in timer_stats_update_stats (right before the check for active)
would be enough, but that's obviously running on the wrong cpu if we
race... *sigh*

Thanks,
Björn



Fix two races in the timer stats lookup code. One by ensuring that the
initialization of a new entry is finished upon insertion of that entry.
The other by cleaning up the hash table when the entries array is
cleared, so that we don't have "pre-inserted" entries.

Thanks to Eric Dumazet for reminding me of the memory barriers.

Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_stats.c b/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
index 868f1bc..63d00f9 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer_stats.c
@@ -117,21 +117,6 @@ static struct entry entries[MAX_ENTRIES];
 
 static atomic_t overflow_count;
 
-static void reset_entries(void)
-{
-	nr_entries = 0;
-	memset(entries, 0, sizeof(entries));
-	atomic_set(&overflow_count, 0);
-}
-
-static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
-{
-	if (nr_entries >= MAX_ENTRIES)
-		return NULL;
-
-	return entries + nr_entries++;
-}
-
 /*
  * The entries are in a hash-table, for fast lookup:
  */
@@ -149,6 +134,22 @@ static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
 
 static struct entry *tstat_hash_table[TSTAT_HASH_SIZE] __read_mostly;
 
+static void reset_entries(void)
+{
+	nr_entries = 0;
+	memset(entries, 0, sizeof(entries));
+	memset(tstat_hash_table, 0, sizeof(tstat_hash_table));
+	atomic_set(&overflow_count, 0);
+}
+
+static struct entry *alloc_entry(void)
+{
+	if (nr_entries >= MAX_ENTRIES)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return entries + nr_entries++;
+}
+
 static int match_entries(struct entry *entry1, struct entry *entry2)
 {
 	return entry1->timer       == entry2->timer	  &&
@@ -202,12 +203,15 @@ static struct entry *tstat_lookup(struct entry *entry, char *comm)
 	if (curr) {
 		*curr = *entry;
 		curr->count = 0;
+		curr->next = NULL;
 		memcpy(curr->comm, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+
+		smp_mb(); /* Ensure that curr is initialized before insert */
+
 		if (prev)
 			prev->next = curr;
 		else
 			*head = curr;
-		curr->next = NULL;
 	}
  out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&table_lock);
@@ -360,6 +364,7 @@ static ssize_t tstats_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 		if (!active) {
 			reset_entries();
 			time_start = ktime_get();
+			smb_mb();
 			active = 1;
 		}
 		break;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux