On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:42:26PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > drivers/char/tty_io.c: Use spinlock instead of a (binary) semaphore Looks good. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v3)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 13/22] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : common core functions
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- Index(es):
 |