Re: [git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one

From: Rankle_ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:26:54 +0800

>  From 30d6996860f7e5589d1bce10404bbcfd6592c9de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Denis Cheng <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:58 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and 
> dst_discard_out are the same,
> they should merged into one
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[email protected]>

Your email client has changed all of the tab characters into spaces,
corrupting the patch.

Please configure your email client to not perform any text formatting.

Please test this, by emailing the patch to yourself and trying to
apply it, before resending.

Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one
  - From: "rae l" <[email protected]>

References:
- [git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one
  - From: Rankle_ <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Per-container pages reclamation
Previous by thread: [git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one
Next by thread: Re: [git patch] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,,they should merged into one
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]