On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:03:22 +0800 Bryan Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > W: unable to extract a valid address from: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Maybe it didn't like the "fundation" typo. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] [RAMFS NOMMU]: a bug in ramfs_nommu_resize function, passing old size to vmtruncate
- From: Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [RAMFS NOMMU]: a bug in ramfs_nommu_resize function, passing old size to vmtruncate
- From: Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [RAMFS NOMMU]: a bug in ramfs_nommu_resize function, passing old size to vmtruncate
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [RAMFS NOMMU]: a bug in ramfs_nommu_resize function, passing old size to vmtruncate
- From: Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [RAMFS NOMMU]: a bug in ramfs_nommu_resize function, passing old size to vmtruncate
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] cxgb3 - TP SRAM update
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [RAMFS NOMMU]: a bug in ramfs_nommu_resize function, passing old size to vmtruncate
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [RAMFS NOMMU]: a bug in ramfs_nommu_resize function, passing old size to vmtruncate
- Index(es):