From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:10:39 -0500 > Are you agreeing that "it seems wasteful to add per-packet overhead"? > This patch is not doing that. Yes, and I know that :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] dma-mapping: prevent dma dependent code from linking on !HAS_DMA archs
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/3] PM: Hibernation and suspend notifiers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
- Index(es):
 |