Re: Sending signals to a kernel thread, broken in 2.6.22

Hi.

On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:51 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> 
> > Hmm. Given Oleg's reply, it could pay to check that freezable kernel
> > threads are still being frozen.
> 
> I don't think we have to worry about this.  See this discussion thread:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?t=118045713200006&r=1&w=2
> 
> and in particular this message:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=118046964817995&w=2

Ok, cool. Thanks both of you for the quick reply.

Nigel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • Re: Sending signals to a kernel thread, broken in 2.6.22
    • From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ide_in_drive_list(): "ALL" is not a wildcard anymore.
• Previous by thread: Re: Sending signals to a kernel thread, broken in 2.6.22
• Next by thread: Re: Sending signals to a kernel thread, broken in 2.6.22
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]