Satyam Sharma ([email protected]) said:
> But yes, the kind of "fixes" you pointed out that _remove_ these conditions
> are definitely *not* what we would want to do.
I can see that - but I think it should be at least be brought up for each
warning, to determine either:
1) if it should be ignored
2) if a signed type is actually intended
3) if the code should be elided
While not necessarily in the IB instances, there are cases where there
are entire blocks of code (with debugging output, error returns, etc)
that can never get run, and it may make sense to remove those.
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
