Re: [PATCH 2/7] cxgb3 - fix netpoll hanlder

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Look at the function argument... 

Yes, it's void *.  But my point is that C requires the ?: to evaluate to
some specific type, so if you have different types on each side of the :
the compiler can be legitimately upset.  The fact that the whole thing
gets cast to void * is somewhat irrelevant.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/7] cxgb3 - fix netpoll hanlder
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH 2/7] cxgb3 - fix netpoll hanlder
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/7] cxgb3 - fix netpoll hanlder
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/7] cxgb3 - fix netpoll hanlder
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative)
• Next by Date: [PATCH 2/6] lockdep: sanitise CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cxgb3 - fix netpoll hanlder
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/7] cxgb3 - Fix direct XAUI support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]