Hi! > (Trimmed the Cc:s quite heavily - I think this has gone somewhere beyond > the original point) > > > Notice that we want to be able to suspend while hibernating -- for > > suspend to both behaviour. So drivers may _not_ rely on system being > > runnable. > > So keep the driver layers read-only and unfreeze the processes after > doing the atomic copy. To read firmware you probably need to _write_ atimes. Anyway, make-disks-read-only patch would be welcome. I just think it is going to be more complex than freezer. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Prev by Date: Re: dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative)
- Next by Date: Re: JFFS2 using 'private' zlib header (was [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6)
- Previous by thread: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Next by thread: Need suspend-to-ram maintainer Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Index(es):
 |