Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockstat: core infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:

> [...] We can argue that sched_clock is "good enough".  If someone 
> wants better accounting of locks on some other arch, they can simply 
> change sched_clock to be more precise.

exactly. Imprecise sched_clock() if there's a better fast clock source 
available is a bug in the architecture code. If the only available 
clocksource is 1 msec resolution then there's no solution and nothing to 
talk about - lock statistics will be 1msec granular just as much as 
scheduling.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux