Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:19:45PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> > Actually, this is the only way to define circular referencing
> > structures.
> 
> No, you have forward declarations for that. These are missing here.

I am no gcc expert, but might this be considred an implicit declaration?
IIRC the compiler warns if later the type does noch match. Does it keep
quiet when it matches?

Bye,

Joerg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/2] A few more m68k patches
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
  • [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
    • From: Joerg Dorchain <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH RFC] qla2xxx: fix timeout in qla2x00_down_timeout
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] FILESYSTEMS: Delete unused "int dummy[5]" from inodes_stat_t.
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]