On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:12:37AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> it might be better to indicate -EOPNOTSUPP right from
> device-mapper.
Indeed we should. For support, on receipt of a barrier, dm core should
send a zero-length barrier to all active underlying paths, and delay
mapping any further I/O.
Alasdair
--
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]