Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:03:54 +0100 (BST) "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey, you have volatiles and checkpatch.pl didn't complain. Andy, a
> reference to Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt would suit.
>
> (That's
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc2/2.6.22-rc2-mm1/broken-out/volatile-considered-harmful-take-3.patch)
Added ...
Use of volatile is usually wrong: see
Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
PATCH: XXX.eml:374:
FILE: linux-2.6.22-rc2/drivers/serial/zs.c:131:
+ volatile void __iomem *control = zport->port.membase +
[...]
I will batch up any changes to checkpatch.pl and send you them as a blob
when they get "interesting" if that suits.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
