Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure

Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> writes:

> I was puzzled by this as well, as there were no compiler warnings...
>
> Apparently you get a warning only if the _first_ occurrence of a struct
> is declared inside a parameter list of a function.

The parameter list has its own scope.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [email protected]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 0/2] A few more m68k patches
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Add /proc/sys/vm/compact_node for the explicit compaction of a node
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: runtime patching infrastructure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]