On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:23:31PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Matt Mackall a écrit :
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:15:01AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> >>Another thing which I noticed is that when Matt Mackall took over
> >>maintainership of /dev/random, he apparently took out one of the
> >>safeguards I had, which was that before, when entropy was extracted
> >>from the pool the time stamp when it was extracted was mixed back into
> >>the pool. The theory was that an external attacker might not know
> >>when a program might be calling /dev/random, so mixing in the time of
> >>that entropy was extracted wouldn't hurt, and might help. I'll submit
> >>a patch to add that support back in, which will help you a little.
> >
> >It's still there, and in the same place, it just looks different:
> >
> >static void add_timer_randomness(struct timer_rand_state *state,
> >unsigned num)
> >{
> >...
> > sample.jiffies = jiffies;
> > sample.cycles = get_cycles();
> > sample.num = num;
> > add_entropy_words(&input_pool, (u32 *)&sample,
> > sizeof(sample)/4);
> >
> >Trouble is the write(2) interface calls add_entropy_words directly, as
> >does the pool initialization function.
> >
> >We might as well mix jiffies and cycles in at init time in a manner
> >similar to the above. Something like this (untested):
> >
> >Index: l/drivers/char/random.c
> >===================================================================
> >--- l.orig/drivers/char/random.c 2007-05-29 12:45:00.000000000 -0500
> >+++ l/drivers/char/random.c 2007-05-29 12:44:02.000000000 -0500
> >@@ -559,6 +559,26 @@ static struct timer_rand_state input_tim
> > static struct timer_rand_state *irq_timer_state[NR_IRQS];
> >
> > /*
> >+ * Mix a sample of the current time into the pool with no entropy
> >+ * accounting
> >+ */
> >+static long __add_timer_randomness(void)
> >+{
> >+ struct {
> >+ cycles_t cycles;
> >+ long jiffies;
> >+ unsigned num;
> >+ } sample;
> >+
> >+ sample.jiffies = jiffies;
> >+ sample.cycles = get_cycles();
> >+ sample.num = num;
> >+ add_entropy_words(&input_pool, (u32 *)&sample, sizeof(sample)/4);
>
> Well, you need to pass 'num' argument I guess.
Yep, fixed version already posted.
> But... How is this supposed to work on 64 bits arches ?
>
> Because of alignment, 'struct sample' will include a 4 bytes filler after
> 'unsigned num', and sizeof(sample) will include this (null) filler in
> entropy pool.
Doesn't matter, just churns the pool a bit more. It gets XORed over
existing data (aka NOP) and doesn't get counted as extra entropy or
anything.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
