On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:56:01 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > When a cpu is disabled, move_task_off_dead_cpu() is called for tasks
> > > that have been running on that cpu.
> >
> > So I still have these three patches in the pending queue but I was
> > rather hoping that the scheduler, sched-domains and cpuset people
> > could take a look at them, please.
> >
> > They hit sched.c and cpuset.c mainly, and they might trash Ingo's CFS
> > patch (I haven't checked).
>
> The patch looks good to me. It applies cleanly ontop of CFS and it
> builds and boots fine with and without CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG (although i
> havent tried to explicitly stress the codepath in question). We are a
> bit paranoid in this codepath but it's not performance-critical
> normally.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>
I applied this to -mm, thanks.
The other two patches don't apply well to the current pending patch queue
and nobody seems keen on doing a serious review (or any review, iirc), so I
ducked them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
