Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset


On Tue, 29 May 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> 
> There are a zillion USB patches in 2.6.22-rc*.
> Greg: got any good suggestions on which one to revert first?

Any chance of bisecting it?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
  - From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
  - From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

References:
- Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
  - From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Seeding /dev/random not working
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker
Previous by thread: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
Next by thread: Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]