On Tue, 29 May 2007 12:04:30 -0400,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that #3 is a good idea as well - we have a lot of sysfs
> objects on any given system and slimming down sysfs benefits everyone.
Yes, and the added complexity is not that bad.
The patchset seems to work fine so far on the (small z/VM guest) system
I tested it a bit on; I'll try a huge (LPAR) system next.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
