Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14

* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> > [...] in update_stats_enqueue(), It seem that these statements in 
> > two brances of "if (p->load_weight > NICE_0_LOAD)" are same, is it 
> > on purpose?
> 
> what do you mean?

you are right indeed. Mike Galbraith has sent a cleanup patch that 
removes that duplication (and uses div64_s()).

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
    • From: Li Yu <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
    • From: Li Yu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] signal: multithread program returns with wrong errno on receiving SIGSTOP
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]