> Having the kernel not reparent user processes to init is an interesting
> idea, especially when those processes have not existed. I'm not
> certain that is POSIX complaint and otherwise backwards compatible.
It's hard to see how it would work. There has to be some parent PID. The
reason using 1 makes sense is that it is always there. Anything >0 and not
the PID of some live process could be reused for a new process at some point.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
