On 5/28/07, Peter Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
In any case, there's no point having cpu affinity if it's going to be ignored. Maybe you could have two levels of affinity: 1. if set by a root it must be obeyed; and 2. if set by an ordinary user it can be overridden if the best interests of the system dictate. BUT I think that would be a bad idea.
Something like that already exists (at least for controlling the bounding set of allowed cpus) via cpusets. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker
- Next by Date: =?utf-7?b?UkU6ICtBRnMtcGF0Y2grQUYwLSBBZGQgdGhlIGRldmljZSBJRHMgZg==?==?utf-7?b?b3IgQU1EL0FUSSBTQjcwMA==?=
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
- Index(es):
 |