On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]> wrote:
On Monday 28 May 2007 05:08:54 Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Monday 28 May 2007 04:37:04 Nitin Gupta wrote:
> > > On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]> wrote:
New testbed based on minilzo complete.
Results from run using 1000 runs to generate averages:
1000 run averages:
'Tiny LZO':
Combined: 55.196 usec
Compression: 37.132 usec
Decompression: 18.064 usec
'miniLZO':
Combined: 55.785 usec
Compression: 40.862 usec
Decompression: 14.923 usec
Great!
I believe its now ready for mainline. We can do further cleanups and
optimizations there - more users of this code will surely drive more
enhancements.
(using (tiny/full)/100 for percentages:
'Tiny' is 0.9% faster on average
I think this is more appropriate: [(full-tiny)/full]*100
=> tiny is ~1% faster on average.
Same for the Compression
'safe' decompressor from tiny is 1.2% slower than unsafe from minilzo)
This is expected :)
Cheers,
Nitin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
