Re: udev regression? lsusb silent (no output) since 2.6.22-rc2 at least

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:34:37PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> older kernels. That's all, and correctly configured kernels don't break
> anything.
> 
> > So instead of papering this breakage over with cleverly worded help texts
> > that suggest a solution, how about we set USB_DEVICE_CLASS to 'y' by default
> > for a few more releases?
> 
> Makes sense, yes.

Good to hear - I also want my kernel to be configured correctly, of course,
but I'm also happy if 'make oldconfig' keeps my correctly configured kernel,
configured correctly.

So USB_DEVICE_CLASS='y' for a few more cycles is like music to my ears. 

> > "Some distributions need this feature for lsusb to work, unless the udev rule
> >  above is configured".
> 
> It's libusb access in general and not specific to lsusb.

"Some distributions need this feature for libusb-based applications (like
 lsusb) to work, unless the udev rule above is configured"

The reason I stress lsusb so much is because for many operators, it is the
first thing they do in case of USB problems 'is my device even there?'.

So it would be what people notice breaking - even though the underlying
issue is with libusb.

Thanks!

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://netherlabs.nl              Open and Closed source services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux