[PATCH -mm 3/3] Freezer: Remove redundant check in try_to_freeze_tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

We don't need to check if todo is positive before calling time_after() in
try_to_freeze_tasks(), because if todo is zero at this point, the loop will
be broken anyway due to the while () condition being false.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/power/process.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.22-rc2/kernel/power/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc2.orig/kernel/power/process.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc2/kernel/power/process.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(int freez
 		} while_each_thread(g, p);
 		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 		yield();			/* Yield is okay here */
-		if (todo && time_after(jiffies, end_time))
+		if (time_after(jiffies, end_time))
 			break;
 	} while (todo);
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux