From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
We don't need to check if todo is positive before calling time_after() in
try_to_freeze_tasks(), because if todo is zero at this point, the loop will
be broken anyway due to the while () condition being false.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
---
kernel/power/process.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc2/kernel/power/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc2.orig/kernel/power/process.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc2/kernel/power/process.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(int freez
} while_each_thread(g, p);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
yield(); /* Yield is okay here */
- if (todo && time_after(jiffies, end_time))
+ if (time_after(jiffies, end_time))
break;
} while (todo);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
