Hello.
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > exec { "/usr/bin/gunzip" } "gzip", "-9", "some/file/to.gz";
> The above Perl code executes /usr/bin/gunzip and sets argv[0] to "gzip", so
> this confirms that the value of argv[0] is arbitrary. Well great, we already
> knew.
> AppArmor does not look at argv[0] for anything, and doing so would be insane.
> So please don't jump to the wrong conclusions.
I agree that argv[0] checking is different from pathname-based access control
or label-based access control, but I want to say argv[0] checking is still needed.
If you don't check argv[0], an attacker can request everything like
exec { "/bin/ls" } "/sbin/busybox", "cat", "/etc/shadow";
exec { "/bin/ls" } "/sbin/busybox", "rm", "/etc/shadow";
if /bin/ls and /bin/cat and /bin/rm are hardlinks of /sbin/busybox (e.g. embedded systems).
Therefore, TOMOYO Linux checks the combination of filename and argv[0] passed to execve().
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
