On 25 May 2007, at 11:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
What is the performance difference between safe and unsafe version?
On 24 May 2007, at 23:26, Richard Purdie wrote:
For my minilzo kernel patch, the safe version showed a 7.2% performancehit.
The conclusion seemed to be that we should drop the 'unsafe' version on this basis.
Michael-Luke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Prev by Date: Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- Next by Date: Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Index(es):
 |