On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 07:13:52PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> >
> > So what, the alternative is leave oprofile busted in 2.6.21.x even longer?
>
> stable is about backporting _well tested_ patches from mainline.
>
> If the stable request comes in from someone 5 minutes after the mainline submission
> I don't see how that testing should happen.
And how many people have picked up on the fact that the fix in 2.6.22rc is busted
in the last week ?
Ie, we'd be waiting probably until after .22 goes out before we found out it's
still horked, and leaving .21.x busted for another three weeks.
If the functionality is completely busted in -stable, adding a patch that's
isolated to that component can't really make things much worse.
All we've done here is move the breakage.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
