Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i found an accounting bug in this: it didnt sum up threads correctly. 
> The patch below fixes this. The stime == 0 problem is still there 
> though.
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

Thanks! I'll test the code on Monday. I do not understand the
sysctl_sched_smoothing functionality, so I do not understand
its impact on accounting. I'll take a look more closely

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
Next by Date: Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]