Re: [PATCH] potential parse error in ifdef

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Fri, 25 May 2007 13:50:37 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 May 2007, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
> 
> > I have made a tool to parse the kernel that does not pre-process the
> > source. That means that my parser tries to parse all the code, including
> > code in the #else branch or code that is not often compiled because
> > the driver is not very used (or not used at all). So, my parser
> > sometimes reports parse error not originally detected by gcc. 
> > Here is my (first) patch.
> >  drivers/char/watchdog/ixp2000_wdt.c |    2 +-
> >  drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c        |    2 +-
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/autcpu12.c         |    2 +-
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/ppchameleonevb.c   |    2 +-
> >  drivers/net/amd8111e.c              |    2 +-
> >  drivers/net/skfp/smt.c              |    2 +-
> >  drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c |    2 +-
> >  sound/arm/sa11xx-uda1341.c          |    2 +-
> >  8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> As these are totally independent fixes across various subsystems, you 
> should probably split the patch into per-subsystem patches and submit them 
> separately.

That's normally true, yes.  But for a bunch of obviously-better one-line
fixes in code which nobody has even compiled in ages, I think we can bend
the rules a bit and just slam it in.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/