Hi Richard,
On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:15 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Richard, can you please provide perf. results for this patch also?
> Also, can you please mail back latest version of your LZO patch? In
> meantime, I will try to include benchmarking support to the
> 'compress-test' module.
This version is 15% slower at decompression and about equal on
compression.
I hope you tested your _safe variant against this, Nitin has done away
with the _unsafe version in this patch. Also, are you using your crypto
lzo-support + tcrypt changes ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/1/303 ) to
benchmark these?
I am however still strongly of the opinion that we should just use the
version in -mm (which is my latest version).
Right, if the difference is anything >10%, code cleanup does lose
its attractiveness.
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
