On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:05:36PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> great. Btw., could you please keep the "up to this point there should be
> no behavioral change in CFS" fundamental splitup of your patches -
sure ..basically the changes required in CFS core is the introduction of two
structures - struct sched_entity and struct lrq and generalization of
cfs routines to operate on these structures rather than on
task_struct/rq structures directly.
In the first split, I will ensure that this generalization is applied
only to tasks (which represents reorganization of core with no
behavioral/functional change in scheduler) and in a subsequent split/patch I
will apply the generalization to uids also (which will add group fairness
aspect to scheduler), as you require.
Thanks for your feedback so far!
> that way i can look at the core changes (and possibly apply them) without
> having to consider the uid based changes (which do change behavior and
> which need more upstream buy-in).
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
