Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ismail Dönmez wrote:
>> > On Thursday 24 May 2007 20:38:05 Diego Calleja wrote:
>> >> Maybe this is a too picky requeriment, but IMO it would be nice if the
>> >> module would be called "camera_stk11xx", or had any other prefix that gives
>> >> some meaning about what is doing. It's hard to decipher from the name when
>> >> you run lsmod.
>> >
>> > That would be too picky indeed since other camera modules have no camera_
>> > prefix like pwc,spca5xx, etc.
>>
>> Then how about adding that prefix to all of them and provide the current
>> name as module alias?
>>
>> Or at least, why not use better names for new modules?
>
> Just because modules can serve more that one interface of the device?
> (audio/mic, camera), (remote controller, dvb grabber). I didn't get
> the point of having the prefix in the name, what's the matter?
A prefix which describes the function of a driver is of course only
useful if it /correctly/ describes it. What would be /correct/? If a
driver for a audio + video capable camera supports either both audio and
video capture or only video capture, I don't see anything wrong with a
prefix like "camera".
That said, we have "modinfo" at our disposal if we spot something
nondescript in lsmod's listing.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= ==--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
