On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:39:33AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 13:05 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > On 5/25/07, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > call_r_s_f() still needs an urgent rerenaming though =B-)
> >
> > So does "call_r_s_f_here()" :-)
>
> That name makes me think of INTERCAL's 'DO COME FROM' statement.
> And any code that makes one think of INTERCAL is say,.. special.. :-)
Propose a better way to code this then? It's not my fault that dealing with
callbacks in C is so messy. _here just massages one callback
prototype (smp_call_function's) into another (cpufreq's) because
both callbacks do the same in this case.
The r_s_f BTW stands for resync_sc_freq which is a function earlier
in the file and should be familiar to a serious reader.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
