Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo

On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:08:38PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> I think it's generally a good idea to push cpuinfo flags in earliest
> as possible; just make sure we actually use the final name (so that we don't get
> into a pni->sse3 mess again) 
>  

ida is official name as in the Software Developer's Manual now. So, should
not be a issue unless marketing folks change their mind in future :-)

Thanks,
Venki
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
  - From: Venki Pallipadi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] RTC: Ratelimit "lost interrupts" message
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] msi: Fix the ordering of msix irqs.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]