Re: Status of CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:29:39PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 23 2007 23:22, Adrian Bunk wrote:
And we need only two different inline levels (__always_inline and
"let the compiler decide"), not three (__always_inline, inline and
"let the compiler decide").
"inline" is "let the compiler decide". If it is not, then it is "let the
compiler decide, based on my bias that I think it should be inlined".

Wrong.
"static" is "let the compiler decide".

and "inline" is "give the compiler a suggestion". Not more than that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux