On Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:20:14 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Sure. I think mmconfig is perfectly sane if it falls back to conf1
> > accesses for legacy stuff..
>
> .. but without a regression, it's obviously a post-2.6.22 thing, I guess I
> should make that clear, just because I think people send me patches after
> -rc1 way too eagerly just because they think it fixes a bug.
>
> Basically if it's not somethign that has _ever_ worked some way, it's not
> a bug, it's a feature ;)
No, I know better than to send something after your merge window closes. I
have no desire to be flamed even further on this topic. :)
And come to think of it, adding the enable/disable bits might be good even
with the patch to make legacy accesses go through type 1, since PCIe BAR
probing is probably done the same way (I haven't looked) and so we might run
into the same problems there.
Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
