Alan Cox wrote:
One of the reasons why hardware vendors want to move away from traditional accesses is to be able to use the larger config space in PCI-Express, rather than being locked into the 256-byte legacy PCI config space.Mostly for treacherous computing extensions where subsets of the config space can only be accessed by signed machines blessed by your favourite movie company and video card vendor...
Um, no, Mr. Paranoia, it's a standard part of the spec. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- Index(es):