On 5/21/07, Folkert van Heusden <[email protected]> wrote:
> >What about the following enhancement: I check with sig_fatal if it would
> >kill the process and only then emit a message. So when an application
> >takes care itself of handling it nothing is printed.
> >+ /* emit some logging for unhandled signals
> >+ */
> >+ if (sig_fatal(t, sig))
> Not unhandled_signal()?
Can we already use that one in send_signal? As the signal needs to be
send first I think before we know if it was handled or not? sig_fatal
checks if the handler is set to default - which is it is not taken care
of.
> >+ {
> if (sig_fatal(t, sig)) {
> >+ printk(KERN_WARNING "Sig %d send to %d owned by %d.%d (%s)\n",
> s/send/sent/;
> >+ sig, t -> pid, t -> uid, t -> gid, t -> comm);
> t->pid, t->uid, t->gid, t->comm);
Description:
This patch adds code to the signal-sender making it log a message when
an unhandled fatal signal will be delivered.
Gargh ... why does this want to be in the *kernel*'s logs? In any case, can
you please make this KERN_INFO (or lower) instead of KERN_WARNING.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
