Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/23, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> Okay, it's clear that the two threads are in deadlock.  It's not clear 
> how the deadlock arose to begin with -- apparently there was a remote 
> wakeup request for a root hub at the same time as a device below that 
> root hub was disconnected, which doesn't make much sense.

Please note that this flush_workqueue() was not safe anyway. We are freezing
tasks, and ksuspend_usb_wq is freezeable. So, it could be frozen before
"khubd" task, and we have another deadlock.

> Anyway, this looks like a good place to use cancel_work_sync().  The

Could you use cancel_rearming_delayed_work() ? (It should be renamed to
cancel_delayed_work_sync()).

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux