Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write

> FWIW, I believe Andrew's point was that critical information for Joe
> Enduser (and Joe Patch-Ho) was lacking in the original changelog.

and don't forget Joe eCryptfs-Maintainer-2-Years-In-The-Future.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
  - From: Michael Halcrow <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
  - From: Michael Halcrow <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
  - From: "Nish Aravamudan" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: BUG: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_cachep()
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/14] Introduce union stack
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
Next by thread: [PATCH] doc. clocksources
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]