Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write

> FWIW, I believe Andrew's point was that critical information for Joe
> Enduser (and Joe Patch-Ho) was lacking in the original changelog.

and don't forget Joe eCryptfs-Maintainer-2-Years-In-The-Future.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
    • From: Michael Halcrow <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
    • From: Michael Halcrow <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
    • From: "Nish Aravamudan" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: BUG: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_cachep()
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/14] Introduce union stack
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Delay writing 0's after llseek until write
• Next by thread: [PATCH] doc. clocksources
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]