Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?

"Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]> writes:

> But of course, John is *bang right* that if /**/ makes gcc do (or not do)
> _anything at all_ (be it crying out a warning), then someone surely
> deserves to get his head bashed in ... :-)

I think it's impossible, comments are removed by preprocessor.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
  • Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
    • From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
  • Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
    • From: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <[email protected]>
  • Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
  • Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
    • From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
  • Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
    • From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
• Next by Date: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
• Previous by thread: Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
• Next by thread: Re: any value to "NORET_TYPE" macro?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]