Re: [PATCH] CFS: sched-design-CFS.txt - ambiguity about leftmost and some formatting

* Pranith Kumar D <[email protected]> wrote:

> The document is very clear and explains the basic mechanism of CFS 
> very well. But, i find that the descriptions are a bit up and down. I 
> mean, u use leftmost and rightmost before mentioning that CFS uses 
> rbtree.( which comes much later).
> 
> In the following patch I mentioned the rbtree, the first time you 
> talked about 'leftmost'. Also i did some basic formatting. Hope its 
> not a pain. :)

thanks - but the patch is whitespace damaged and wont apply:

patch: **** malformed patch at line 10: 80% of CFS's design can be 

that's because the leading space got stripped by your mailer.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: sched-design-CFS.txt - ambiguity about leftmost and some formatting
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] CFS: sched-design-CFS.txt - ambiguity about leftmost
  - From: Pranith Kumar D <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: sched-design-CFS.txt - ambiguity about leftmost
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] CFS: sched-design-CFS.txt - ambiguity about leftmost and some formatting
  - From: Pranith Kumar D <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: TCP_MD5 and Intel e1000
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: swap prefetch improvements
Previous by thread: [PATCH] CFS: sched-design-CFS.txt - ambiguity about leftmost and some formatting
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: sched-design-CFS.txt - ambiguity about leftmost and some formatting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]