* Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> I copied the patch into the first email, I did look at it which is why
> you got an email. Your introducing the patch , it's for you to explain
> why it needs to be there.. considering that the comment says "hack" in
> it, I have to wonder what the non-hack version is ..
you might not have realized it, but the problem i think was the attitude
you showed in the very first sentence:
> Where did the arm ep93xx changes come from? It looks like patch below
> came in with them in 2.6.21-rt6 ..
AFAICS Thomas just mirrored that snotty comment back to you, and yes,
when you are on the receiving end it feels nasty, doesnt it? So please
restart and rephrase that into a more polite form and you might get an
answer (although i certainly do not talk for Thomas). Something like:
> Thomas, could you give me a bit more information about why the arm
> ep93xx changes were done in 2.6.21-rt6? I do not seem to understand
> the reason behind that change. I've attached the change below. Thanks!
You are asking Thomas a favor after all... Be a bit more polite when
asking others, and a completely new world might open up for you :-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
