On Tue, 22 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > That would be unpopular with pagecache, because that uses pretty well > all fields. SLUB also uses all fields.... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Fix headers check fallout
- Next by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
- Previous by thread: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- Next by thread: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- Index(es):