On Tue, 22 May 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > For i386(32bit arch), there is not enough space for vmemmap. I thought 32 bit would use flatmem? Is memory really sparse on 32 bit? Likely difficult due to lack of address space? > For 64bit arch, page flags are not exhausted yet. Right. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- References:
- [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- Previous by thread: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- Next by thread: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
- Index(es):
 |