Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

* Linus Torvalds ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chris Wright wrote:
> > ---
> > [chrisw: Why is this not upstream yet?]
> 
> And equally importantly, why is it even in the stable queue if it's not 
> upstream.
> 
> It's against stable rules, and it means that we may have stuff that gets 
> fixed in -stable and not in -upstream, if people don't notice. THAT IS 
> BAD!

It's there specifically to fish out why it was sent to -stable w/out
ever making it upstream.  Having sent the same question w/ no response
5 days ago
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/69] -stable review
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
• Next by Date: Re: [PROBLEM] 2.6.22-rc2 panics on x86-64 with slub
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]